Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/688| Title: | Patient-reported Outcomes in KEYLYNK-010: Pembrolizumab Plus Olaparib Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for Participants with Biomarker-unselected, Previously Treated Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer |
| Authors: | Mehra, N.;Antonarakis, E. S.;Park, S. H.;Goh, J. C.;McDermott, R.;Gonzalez, N. S.;Fong, P. C.;Griel, R.;De Santis, M.;Yanez, P. E.;Huang, Y. H.;Begbie, S. D.;Rey, F.;Kramer, G.;Suzuki, H.;Saretsky, T. L.;Ghate, S. R.;Cui, Y.;Hosius, C.;Yu, E. Y. |
| MNCLHD Author: | Begbie, Stephen |
| Issue Date: | 8-Aug-2025 |
| Citation: | European Urology Oncology. 2025 Aug;8(4):1030-1040. |
| Abstract: | Background and objective: Pembrolizumab plus olaparib did not significantly improve radiographic progression-free survival or overall survival versus a next-generation hormonal agent (NHA) in participants with biomarker-unselected, pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the phase 3 KEYLYNK-010 trial. We present prespecified patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYLYNK-010. Methods: Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive pembrolizumab plus olaparib or an NHA (abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide). PROs were evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Cancer (FACT-P), and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires. The PRO endpoints included time to pain progression (TTPP) as per BPI-SF and the least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to week 15 in FACT-P total, BPI-SF, and EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Key findings and limitations: The PRO analysis population included 774 participants (pembrolizumab plus olaparib, n = 520; NHA, n = 254). The median follow-up was 18.7 (range, 6.1-31.7) mo. No meaningful differences were observed in TTPP for pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus NHA (median: 13.5 vs 12.0 mo; hazard ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.26). From baseline to week 15, no meaningful LSM differences were observed between the treatment groups in FACT-P total, BPI-SF, and EQ-5D VAS scores. Limitations include no formal hypothesis testing. Conclusions and clinical implications: No meaningful differences were observed in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or disease-related symptom scores for pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus NHA in participants with biomarker-unselected, pretreated mCRPC. These findings suggest that pembrolizumab plus olaparib did not negatively impact HRQoL in participants with pretreated mCRPC. |
| URI: | https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/688 |
| PubMed URL: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40685311/ |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.018 |
| Keywords: | olaparib;pembrolizumab;Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant;Quality of Life |
| Appears in Collections: | Oncology / Cancer |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
