Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/688
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMehra, N.-
dc.contributor.authorAntonarakis, E. S.-
dc.contributor.authorPark, S. H.-
dc.contributor.authorGoh, J. C.-
dc.contributor.authorMcDermott, R.-
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, N. S.-
dc.contributor.authorFong, P. C.-
dc.contributor.authorGriel, R.-
dc.contributor.authorDe Santis, M.-
dc.contributor.authorYanez, P. E.-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Y. H.-
dc.contributor.authorBegbie, S. D.-
dc.contributor.authorRey, F.-
dc.contributor.authorKramer, G.-
dc.contributor.authorSuzuki, H.-
dc.contributor.authorSaretsky, T. L.-
dc.contributor.authorGhate, S. R.-
dc.contributor.authorCui, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorHosius, C.-
dc.contributor.authorYu, E. Y.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-23T03:03:12Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-23T03:03:12Z-
dc.date.issued2025-08-08-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Urology Oncology. 2025 Aug;8(4):1030-1040.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/688-
dc.description.abstractBackground and objective: Pembrolizumab plus olaparib did not significantly improve radiographic progression-free survival or overall survival versus a next-generation hormonal agent (NHA) in participants with biomarker-unselected, pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the phase 3 KEYLYNK-010 trial. We present prespecified patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYLYNK-010. Methods: Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive pembrolizumab plus olaparib or an NHA (abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide). PROs were evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Cancer (FACT-P), and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires. The PRO endpoints included time to pain progression (TTPP) as per BPI-SF and the least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to week 15 in FACT-P total, BPI-SF, and EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Key findings and limitations: The PRO analysis population included 774 participants (pembrolizumab plus olaparib, n = 520; NHA, n = 254). The median follow-up was 18.7 (range, 6.1-31.7) mo. No meaningful differences were observed in TTPP for pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus NHA (median: 13.5 vs 12.0 mo; hazard ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.26). From baseline to week 15, no meaningful LSM differences were observed between the treatment groups in FACT-P total, BPI-SF, and EQ-5D VAS scores. Limitations include no formal hypothesis testing. Conclusions and clinical implications: No meaningful differences were observed in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or disease-related symptom scores for pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus NHA in participants with biomarker-unselected, pretreated mCRPC. These findings suggest that pembrolizumab plus olaparib did not negatively impact HRQoL in participants with pretreated mCRPC.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectolapariben
dc.subjectpembrolizumaben
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistanten
dc.subjectQuality of Lifeen
dc.titlePatient-reported Outcomes in KEYLYNK-010: Pembrolizumab Plus Olaparib Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for Participants with Biomarker-unselected, Previously Treated Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Canceren
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorBegbie, Stephen-
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40685311/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.018en
Appears in Collections:Oncology / Cancer

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing