Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/552
Title: Health-related quality of life in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: ENZAMET (ANZUP 1304), an international randomized phase III trial led by ANZUP
Authors: Stockler, M. R.;Martin, A. J.;Davis, I. D.;Dhillon, H. M.;Begbie, S. D.;Chi, K. N.;Chowdhury, S.;Coskinas, X.;Frydenberg, M.;Hague, W. E.;Horvath, L. G.;Joshua, A. M.;Lawrence, N. J.;Marx, G. M.;McCaffrey, J.;McDermott, R.;McJannett, M.;North, S. A.;Parnis, F.;Parulekar, W. R.;Pook, D. W.;Reaume, M. N.;Sandhu, S.;Tan, A.;Tan, T. H.;Thomson, A.;Vera-Badillo, F.;Williams, S. G.;Winter, D. G.;Yip, S.;Zhang, A. Y.;Zielinski, R. R.;Sweeney, C. J.;ENSAMET Trial Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group
MNCLHD Author: Begbie, Stephen
Issue Date: Mar-2022
Citation: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2022 Mar 10;40(8):837-846.
Abstract: Purpose: We previously reported that enzalutamide improved overall survival when added to standard of care in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Here, we report its effects on aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQL). Methods: HRQL was assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality-of-life questionnaire and QLM-PR25 at weeks 0, 4, 12, and then every 12 weeks until progression. Scores from week 4 to 156 were analyzed with repeated measures modeling to calculate group means and differences. Deterioration-free survival was from random assignment until the earliest of death, clinical progression, discontinuation of study treatment, or a worsening of 10 points or more from baseline in fatigue, physical function, cognitive function, or overall health and quality of life (OHQL). HRQL scores range from 0 (lowest possible) to 100 (highest possible). Results: HRQL was assessed in 1,042 of 1,125 participants (93%). Differences in means favored control over enzalutamide for fatigue (5.2, 95% CI, 3.6 to 6.9; P < .001), cognitive function (4.0, 95% CI, 2.5 to 5.5; P < .001), and physical function (2.6, 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.9; P < .001), but not OHQL (1.2, 95% CI, -0.2 to 2.7; P = .1). Deterioration-free survival rates at 3 years, and log-rank P values comparing the whole distributions, favored enzalutamide over control for OHQL (31% v 17%; P < .0001), cognitive function (31% v 20%; P = .001), and physical function (31% v 22%; P < .001), but not fatigue (24% v 18%; P = .16). The effects of enzalutamide on HRQL were independent of baseline characteristics. Conclusion: Enzalutamide was associated with worsening of self-reported fatigue, cognitive function, and physical function, but not OHQL. Enzalutamide was associated with improved deterioration-free survival for OHQL, physical function, and cognitive function because delays in disease progression outweighed early deteriorations in these aspects of HRQL.
URI: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/552
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34928708/
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.00941
Keywords: Quality of Life;enzalutamide;Standard of Care;Prostatic Neoplasms;Fatigue;Disease Progression
Appears in Collections:Oncology / Cancer

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat  
jco-40-837.pdf662.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing