Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/501
Title: Enzalutamide with Standard First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Authors: Davis, I. D.;Martin, A. J.;Stockler, M. R.;Begbie, S.;Chi, K. N.;Chowdhury, S.;Coskinas, X.;Frydenbuerg, M.;Hague, W. E.;Horvath, L. G.;Joshua, A. M.;Lawrence, N. J.;Marx, G.;McCaffrey, J.;McDermott, R.;McJannett, M.;North, S. A.;Parnis, F.;Parulekar, W.;Pook, D. W.;Reaume, M. N.;Sandhu, S. K.;Tan, A.;Tan, T. H.;Thomson, A.;Tu, E.;Vera-Badillo, F.;Williams, S, G,;Yip, S.;Zhang, A. Y.;Zielinski, R. R.;Sweeney, C. J.
MNCLHD Author: Begbie, Stephen
Issue Date: Jul-2019
Citation: New England Journal of Medicine . 2019 Jul 11;381(2):121-131.
Abstract: Background: Enzalutamide, an androgen-receptor inhibitor, has been associated with improved overall survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer. It is not known whether adding enzalutamide to testosterone suppression, with or without early docetaxel, will improve survival in men with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Methods: In this open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial, we assigned patients to receive testosterone suppression plus either open-label enzalutamide or a standard nonsteroidal antiandrogen therapy (standard-care group). The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included progression-free survival as determined by the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, clinical progression-free survival, and adverse events. Results: A total of 1125 men underwent randomization; the median follow-up was 34 months. There were 102 deaths in the enzalutamide group and 143 deaths in the standard-care group (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.86; P = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival at 3 years were 80% (based on 94 events) in the enzalutamide group and 72% (based on 130 events) in the standard-care group. Better results with enzalutamide were also seen in PSA progression-free survival (174 and 333 events, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.39; P<0.001) and in clinical progression-free survival (167 and 320 events, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.40; P<0.001). Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was more frequent in the enzalutamide group than in the standard-care group (33 events and 14 events, respectively). Fatigue was more common in the enzalutamide group; seizures occurred in 7 patients in the enzalutamide group (1%) and in no patients in the standard-care group. Conclusions: Enzalutamide was associated with significantly longer progression-free and overall survival than standard care in men with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer receiving testosterone suppression. The enzalutamide group had a higher incidence of seizures and other toxic effects, especially among those treated with early docetaxel. (Funded by Astellas Scientific and Medical Affairs and others; ENZAMET (ANZUP 1304) ANZCTR number, ACTRN12614000110684; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02446405; and EU Clinical Trials Register number, 2014-003190-42.).
URI: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/501
Keywords: Docetaxel;Prostate-Specific Antigen;Progression-Free Survival;Nonsteroidal Anti-Androgens;enzalutamide;Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant;Disease-Free Survival;Androgen Receptor Antagonists;Testosterone
Appears in Collections:Oncology / Cancer

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing