Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/494
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCurley, D.-
dc.contributor.authorKinsman, L.-
dc.contributor.authorMooney, G.-
dc.contributor.authorWhiteford, G.-
dc.contributor.authorLower, T.-
dc.contributor.authorHobbs, M.-
dc.contributor.authorMorris, B.-
dc.contributor.authorBartlett, K-
dc.contributor.authorJacob, A.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-03T23:07:36Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-03T23:07:36Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Journal of Rural Health . 2024 Oct;32(5):969-975.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/494-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To measure compliance with Advance Care Directives (ACDs) for decedents in a rural setting. Design: Observational, cross-sectional medical records audit comparing requests in ACDs with actual outcomes. Setting: Rural Australian coastal district. Participants: People who had an ACD, died during the study period (30 May 2020 to 15 December 2021) and participated in a local research project. Main outcome measure(s): Compliance was measured by comparing stated requests in the ACD with outcomes recorded in medical records. This included the place of death and a list of 'unacceptable interventions'. Results: Sixty-eight people met the inclusion criteria (age range of 46-92 [mean 67 years; median 74 years]; 42 [62%] male). The main cause of death was cancer (n = 48; 71%). Preferred place of death was not stated in 16 ACDs. Compliance with documented preferred place of death was 63% (33/52): 48% (16/33) when the preferred place of death was home; 78% (7/9) when sub-acute was preferred; and 100% (10/10) when hospital was preferred. Compliance was 100% with 'unacceptable interventions'. Conclusion: These results demonstrate strong compliance with rural patients' requests in ACDs, particularly 'unacceptable interventions'. Home was the most common preferred place of death, but the compliance measure (48%) was the lowest in this study. This requires further exploration. Keywords: advance care directive; end‐of‐life; palliative care; rural.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectPalliative Careen
dc.subjectDeathen
dc.subjectAustraliaen
dc.subjectAdvance Care Planningen
dc.subjectAdvance Directivesen
dc.subjectAdvance Directive Complianceen
dc.subjectDirective Adherenceen
dc.subjectRural Healthen
dc.titleA cross-sectional study assessing concordance with advance care directives in a rural health districten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorCurley, Dan-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorMooney, Graeme-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorMorris, Beverly-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorBartlett, Beverley-
Appears in Collections:Allied Health
Health Services Research
Nursing
Public Health / Health Promotion

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing