Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/472
Title: Capnography monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia: a systematic review protocol
Authors: Conway, A.;Douglas, C.;Sutherland, J.
MNCLHD Author: Sutherland, Joanna
Issue Date: Jul-2015
Citation: Systematic Reviews . 2015 Jul 14:4:92.
Abstract: An important potential clinical benefit of using capnography monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is that this technology could improve patient safety by reducing serious sedation-related adverse events, such as death or permanent neurological disability, which are caused by inadequate oxygenation. The hypothesis is that earlier identification of respiratory depression using capnography leads to a change in clinical management that prevents hypoxaemia. As inadequate oxygenation/ventilation is the most common reason for injury associated with PSA, reducing episodes of hypoxaemia would indicate that using capnography would be safer than relying on standard monitoring alone. Methods/design: The primary objective of this review is to determine whether using capnography during PSA in the hospital setting improves patient safety by reducing the risk of hypoxaemia (defined as an arterial partial pressure of oxygen below 60 mmHg or percentage of haemoglobin that is saturated with oxygen [SpO(2)] less than 90 %). A secondary objective of this review is to determine whether changes in the clinical management of sedated patients are the mediating factor for any observed impact of capnography monitoring on the rate of hypoxaemia. The potential adverse effect of capnography monitoring that will be examined in this review is the rate of inadequate sedation. Electronic databases will be searched for parallel, crossover and cluster randomised controlled trials comparing the use of capnography with standard monitoring alone during PSA that is administered in the hospital setting. Studies that included patients who received general or regional anaesthesia will be excluded from the review. Non-randomised studies will be excluded. Screening, study selection and data extraction will be performed by two reviewers. The Cochrane risk of bias tool will be used to assign a judgment about the degree of risk. Meta-analyses will be performed if suitable. Discussion: This review will synthesise the evidence on an important potential clinical benefit of capnography monitoring during PSA within hospital settings.
URI: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/472
Keywords: Prostate-Specific Antigen;Hypoxia;Patient Safety;Medical Analysis;Capnography;Anesthesia, Conduction
Appears in Collections:Medicine

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat  
Capnography monitoring during procedural.pdf405.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing