Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/742
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNair-Shalliker, V.-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, D. P.-
dc.contributor.authorGebski, V.-
dc.contributor.authorPatel, M. I.-
dc.contributor.authorFrydenberg, M.-
dc.contributor.authorYaxley, J.-
dc.contributor.authorGardiner, R.-
dc.contributor.authorEspinoza, D.-
dc.contributor.authorKimlin, M. G.-
dc.contributor.authorDhillon, V.-
dc.contributor.authorLeifert, W.-
dc.contributor.authorGillatt, D.-
dc.contributor.authorWoo, H.-
dc.contributor.authorRasiah, K.-
dc.contributor.authorAwad, Nader-
dc.contributor.authorSymons, J.-
dc.contributor.authorWells, J. K.-
dc.contributor.authorPickett, M.-
dc.contributor.authorFrench, M.-
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, P. H.-
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, B. K.-
dc.contributor.authorGurney, H.-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-24T06:43:27Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-24T06:43:27Z-
dc.date.issued2026-03-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Cancer, Volume 134, Issue 5, pp. 735-745.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/742-
dc.description.abstractBackground The ProsD trial aimed to determine if oral vitamin D supplementation could prevent prostate cancer ( PC ) progression in men on active surveillance ( AS ). Methods ProsD is a phase-II double-blinded randomized trial of newly diagnosed, low-intermediate risk PC cases, aged between 50 and 80 years and on AS. The intervention was a monthly oral dose of cholecalciferol (50,000IU; Vitamin D) or placebo. Primary and secondary endpoints were active therapy-free ( ATFS ) and progression-free ( PFS ) survival, respectively. Blood samples were analysed for vitamin D metabolites and cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome (CBMN) markers for lymphocytic genome damage. Results There were 123 randomised participants (81 vitamin D and 42 placebo) included in this analysis. Mean (SD) for age was 66.5 (6.6) years and for 25(OH)D levels were 72.0 (19.9) and 66.4 (18.4) nmol/L at baseline ( p  = 0.1), and 91.9 (19.9) and 60.4 (24.4) nmol/L at 24 months, in the vitamin D and placebo arms respectively. There were no appreciable differences in ATFS (p log-rank  = 0.44), PFS (p p log-rank  = 0.60) and occurrence of adverse events, in each trial arm. There were declines in some of the lymphocytic CBMN markers in the vitamin D arm. Conclusion Vitamin D supplementation did not prevent PC progression, although reduced prevalence of CBMN markers may indicate a benefit of vitamin D supplementation. Trial registration Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616001707459). Key points Findings: In this phase 2 randomised trial involving 123 prostate cancer patients with low-intermediate risk of progression, vitamin D supplementation did not prevent patients discontinuing active surveillance in favour of active therapy. However, vitamin D supplementation reduced prevalence of lymphocytic genome damage markers that are predictors of cancer risk. Meaning: Vitamin D supplementation may not prevent progression of well-developed prostate cancers, however reduction in the prevalence of lymphocytic genome damage in the vitamin D arm of the study suggests an anti-cancer effect that may prevent the initiation of new cancers.en
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasmsen
dc.subjectDietary Supplementsen
dc.subjectVitamin Den
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectPrevalenceen
dc.subjectWatchful Waitingen
dc.subjectAustraliaen
dc.subjectNew Zealanden
dc.titleHigh-dose vitamin D supplementation and prostate cancer progression: a phase II randomised trial in localised prostate cancer cases with intermediate risk of progression (ProsD)en
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorAwad, Nader-
Appears in Collections:Oncology / Cancer

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing