Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/689
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNamba, S.-
dc.contributor.authorSteel, J.-
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, M.-
dc.contributor.authorThompson, H.-
dc.contributor.authorBaylis, A.-
dc.contributor.authorHansen, C.-
dc.contributor.authorShakespeare, T.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-23T03:08:32Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-23T03:08:32Z-
dc.date.issued2025-06-13-
dc.identifier.citationTechnical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology. 2025 Jun 13:35:100318en
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/689-
dc.description.abstractThis study explored whether tattoo-less surface guided setups with a first 4 fractions then weekly imaging schedule (F1-4&W) is a suitable alternative to tattoo alignment setups for adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) patients. The daily CBCT images (n = 450) of 30 patients treated using tattoo-less surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) were retrospectively re-matched to a WBRT protocol. The accuracy of the re-match was assessed, and a F1-4&W imaging schedule applied to investigate the percentage of fractions that would have been treated to a 0.5 cm tolerance. The results were compared with the setup accuracy of 100 consecutive patients treated with WBRT using the existing practice of tattoo-based alignment. 95.8 % of the tattoo-less SGRT setup fractions were assessed to be treated within tolerance, with a maximum discrepancy from isocentre of 0.7 cm for a non-imaged fraction. When comparing imaged fractions, 98 % of these patients positioned within 0.5 cm of isocentre, while the tattoo-alignment method achieved this only 80 % of the time. The overall imaging frequency rates per patient were 51 % and 53 % for study (SGRT/CBCT) and control groups (EPI/tattoos) respectively. We conclude that tattoo-less SGRT provides a consistently accurate method to setup supine tangential WBRT patients with a benefit to patient experience. Furthermore, a F1-4&W imaging schedule is sufficient to ensure patients are treated within tolerance, while maintaining appropriate indication for when increased imaging frequency is necessary.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectTattooingen
dc.subjectPatient Positioningen
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasmsen
dc.subjectRadiation Therapyen
dc.titleValidation of a weekly imaging protocol for tangential whole breast radiation therapy with a tattoo-less surface-guided setupen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorNamba, Sumie-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorSteel, Jared G.-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorHoffmann, Matthew-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorThompson, Hannah-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorBaylis, Abbey-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorHansen, Carmen-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorShakespeare, Thomas P.-
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40599300/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100318en
Appears in Collections:Oncology / Cancer

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing