Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/689Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Namba, S. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Steel, J. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hoffmann, M. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Thompson, H. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Baylis, A. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hansen, C. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Shakespeare, T. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-23T03:08:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-23T03:08:32Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-06-13 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology. 2025 Jun 13:35:100318 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/689 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This study explored whether tattoo-less surface guided setups with a first 4 fractions then weekly imaging schedule (F1-4&W) is a suitable alternative to tattoo alignment setups for adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) patients. The daily CBCT images (n = 450) of 30 patients treated using tattoo-less surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) were retrospectively re-matched to a WBRT protocol. The accuracy of the re-match was assessed, and a F1-4&W imaging schedule applied to investigate the percentage of fractions that would have been treated to a 0.5 cm tolerance. The results were compared with the setup accuracy of 100 consecutive patients treated with WBRT using the existing practice of tattoo-based alignment. 95.8 % of the tattoo-less SGRT setup fractions were assessed to be treated within tolerance, with a maximum discrepancy from isocentre of 0.7 cm for a non-imaged fraction. When comparing imaged fractions, 98 % of these patients positioned within 0.5 cm of isocentre, while the tattoo-alignment method achieved this only 80 % of the time. The overall imaging frequency rates per patient were 51 % and 53 % for study (SGRT/CBCT) and control groups (EPI/tattoos) respectively. We conclude that tattoo-less SGRT provides a consistently accurate method to setup supine tangential WBRT patients with a benefit to patient experience. Furthermore, a F1-4&W imaging schedule is sufficient to ensure patients are treated within tolerance, while maintaining appropriate indication for when increased imaging frequency is necessary. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.subject | Tattooing | en |
| dc.subject | Patient Positioning | en |
| dc.subject | Breast Neoplasms | en |
| dc.subject | Radiation Therapy | en |
| dc.title | Validation of a weekly imaging protocol for tangential whole breast radiation therapy with a tattoo-less surface-guided setup | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.contributor.mnclhdauthor | Namba, Sumie | - |
| dc.contributor.mnclhdauthor | Steel, Jared G. | - |
| dc.contributor.mnclhdauthor | Hoffmann, Matthew | - |
| dc.contributor.mnclhdauthor | Thompson, Hannah | - |
| dc.contributor.mnclhdauthor | Baylis, Abbey | - |
| dc.contributor.mnclhdauthor | Hansen, Carmen | - |
| dc.contributor.mnclhdauthor | Shakespeare, Thomas P. | - |
| dc.description.pubmeduri | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40599300/ | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100318 | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Oncology / Cancer | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
