Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/670
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNamba, S.-
dc.contributor.authorSteel, J.-
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, M.-
dc.contributor.authorThompson, H.-
dc.contributor.authorBaylis, A.-
dc.contributor.authorHansen, C.-
dc.contributor.authorShakespeare, T.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T23:23:46Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-09T23:23:46Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-
dc.identifier.citationTechnical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology V. 35. 100318.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/670-
dc.description.abstractThis study explored whether tattoo-less surface guided setups with a first 4 fractions then weekly imaging schedule (F1-4&W) is a suitable alternative to tattoo alignment setups for adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) patients. The daily CBCT images (n = 450) of 30 patients treated using tattoo-less surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) were retrospectively re-matched to a WBRT protocol. The accuracy of the re-match was assessed, and a F1-4&W imaging schedule applied to investigate the percentage of fractions that would have been treated to a 0.5 cm tolerance. The results were compared with the setup accuracy of 100 consecutive patients treated with WBRT using the existing practice of tattoo-based alignment. 95.8 % of the tattoo-less SGRT setup fractions were assessed to be treated within tolerance, with a maximum discrepancy from isocentre of 0.7 cm for a non-imaged fraction. When comparing imaged fractions, 98 % of these patients positioned within 0.5 cm of isocentre, while the tattoo-alignment method achieved this only 80 % of the time. The overall imaging frequency rates per patient were 51 % and 53 % for study (SGRT/CBCT) and control groups (EPI/tattoos) respectively. We conclude that tattoo-less SGRT provides a consistently accurate method to setup supine tangential WBRT patients with a benefit to patient experience. Furthermore, a F1-4&W imaging schedule is sufficient to ensure patients are treated within tolerance, while maintaining appropriate indication for when increased imaging frequency is necessary.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectSRGTen
dc.subjectPatient positioningen
dc.subjectTattoo-lessen
dc.subjectBreast radiation therapyen
dc.titleValidation of a weekly imaging protocol for tangential whole breast radiation therapy with a tattoo-less surface-guided setupen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorNamba, Sumie-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorSteel, Jared G.-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorHoffmann, Matthew-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorThompson, Hannah-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorBaylis, Abbey-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorHansen, Carmen-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorShakespeare, Thomas P.-
dc.description.pubmeduri40599300en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100318en
Appears in Collections:Oncology / Cancer

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat  
main.pdf3.25 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing