Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/613
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorField, M.-
dc.contributor.authorVinod, S.-
dc.contributor.authorAherne, N.-
dc.contributor.authorCarolan, M.-
dc.contributor.authorDekker, A.-
dc.contributor.authorDelaney, G.-
dc.contributor.authorGreenham, S.-
dc.contributor.authorHau, E.-
dc.contributor.authorLehmann, J.-
dc.contributor.authorLudbrook, J.-
dc.contributor.authorMiller, A.-
dc.contributor.authorRezo, A.-
dc.contributor.authorSelvaraj, J.-
dc.contributor.authorSykes, J.-
dc.contributor.authorHolloway, L.-
dc.contributor.authorThwaites, D.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-31T05:09:01Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-31T05:09:01Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology . 2021 Aug;65(5):627-636.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/613-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: There is significant potential to analyse and model routinely collected data for radiotherapy patients to provide evidence to support clinical decisions, particularly where clinical trials evidence is limited or non-existent. However, in practice there are administrative, ethical, technical, logistical and legislative barriers to having coordinated data analysis platforms across radiation oncology centres. Methods: A distributed learning network of computer systems is presented, with software tools to extract and report on oncology data and to enable statistical model development. A distributed or federated learning approach keeps data in the local centre, but models are developed from the entire cohort. Results: The feasibility of this approach is demonstrated across six Australian oncology centres, using routinely collected lung cancer data from oncology information systems. The infrastructure was used to validate and develop machine learning for model-based clinical decision support and for one centre to assess patient eligibility criteria for two major lung cancer radiotherapy clinical trials (RTOG-9410, RTOG-0617). External validation of a 2-year overall survival model for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) gave an AUC of 0.65 and C-index of 0.62 across the network. For one centre, 65% of Stage III NSCLC patients did not meet eligibility criteria for either of the two practice-changing clinical trials, and these patients had poorer survival than eligible patients (10.6 m vs. 15.8 m, P = 0.024). Conclusion: Population-based studies on routine data are possible using a distributed learning approach. This has the potential for decision support models for patients for whom supporting clinical trial evidence is not applicable. Keywords: artificial intelligence; decision support systems; distributed learning; federated learning; radiation oncology.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lungen
dc.subjectLung Neoplasmsen
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligenceen
dc.subjectDecision Support Sysytems, Clinicalen
dc.subjectRadiation Oncologyen
dc.subjectAustraliaen
dc.subjectMaching Learningen
dc.subjectDecision Support Techniquesen
dc.titleImplementation of the Australian Computer-Assisted Theragnostics (AusCAT) network for radiation oncology data extraction, reporting and distributed learningen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorAherne, Noel-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorGreenham, Stuart-
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34331748/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1754-9485.13287en
Appears in Collections:Oncology / Cancer

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing