Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/578
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHolst, J.J.-
dc.contributor.authorBuse, J.B.-
dc.contributor.authorRodbard, H.W.-
dc.contributor.authorLinjawi, Sultan-
dc.contributor.authorWoo, V.C.-
dc.contributor.authorBoesgaard, T.W.-
dc.contributor.authorKvist, K.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-18T23:15:41Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-18T23:15:41Z-
dc.date.issued2015-10-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 2015 Oct;10(2):389-397. DOI:10.1177/1932296815610124en
dc.identifier.issn1932-2968-
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/578-
dc.description.abstractIDegLira is a novel, fixed-ratio combination of the long-acting basal insulin, insulin degludec, and the long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 analog liraglutide. We studied the effect of IDegLira versus its components on postprandial glucose (PPG) in type 2 diabetes. Methods: In this substudy, 260 (15.6%) of the original 1663 patients with inadequate glycemic control participating in a 26-week, open-label trial (DUAL I) were randomized 2:1:1 to once-daily IDegLira, insulin degludec or liraglutide. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for 72 hours and a meal test were performed. Results: At week 26, IDegLira produced a significantly greater decrease from baseline in mean PPG increment (normalized iAUC 0-4h ) than insulin degludec (estimated treatment difference [ETD] −12.79 mg/dl [95% CI: −21.08; −4.68], P = .0023) and a similar magnitude of decrease as liraglutide (ETD −1.62 mg/dl [95% CI: −10.09; 6.67], P = .70). CGM indicated a greater reduction in change from baseline in PPG increment (iAUC 0-4h ) for IDegLira versus insulin degludec over all 3 main meals (ETD −6.13 mg/dl [95% CI: −10.27, −1.98], P = .0047) and similar reductions versus liraglutide (ETD −1.80 mg/dl [95% CI: −2.52, 5.95], P = .4122). Insulin secretion ratio and static index were greater for IDegLira versus insulin degludec ( P = .048 and P = .006, respectively) and similar to liraglutide ( P = .45 and P = .895, respectively). Conclusions: Once-daily IDegLira provides significantly better PPG control following a mixed meal test than insulin degludec. The improvement is at least partially explained by higher endogenous insulin secretion and improved beta cell function with IDegLira. The benefits of liraglutide on PPG control are maintained across all main meals in the combination.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectAdministration dosageen
dc.subjectBlood glucoseen
dc.subjectDrug combinationsen
dc.subjectDrug effectsen
dc.subjectDrug therapyen
dc.subjectHypoglycemic agentsen
dc.subjectInsulin degludecen
dc.subjectInsulin, Long Actingen
dc.subjectLiraglutideen
dc.subjectTherapeutic useen
dc.titleIDegLira Improves Both Fasting and Postprandial Glucose Control as Demonstrated Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring and a Standardized Meal Testen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorLinjawi, Sultan-
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26443290en
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1932296815610124en
Appears in Collections:Public Health / Health Promotion

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing