Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/530
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Smith, S. J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, A. B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kennett, W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vinod, S. K. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-19T05:23:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-19T05:23:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-10 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Patient Education and Counseling. 2022 Oct;105(10):3134-3142. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.06.001. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/530 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted oncology. With pandemic restrictions limiting close contact between individuals, telehealth (the use of teleconferencing/videoconferencing to conduct real-time medical consultations) has been increasingly utilised. This qualitative study aimed to explore adult cancer patient, caregiver, and clinician (doctor, nurse, allied health) telehealth experiences during COVID-19 in urban and rural Australian settings and identify potential enablers and barriers to sustained telehealth implementation. Methods: English-speaking participants completed semi-structured interviews regarding their telehealth experiences since March 2020. Interviews ceased when data saturation occurred. Iterative thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 12 Pro. Results: Thirty-four interviews (clinician=14, patient=13, caregiver=7) were conducted from April to August 2021. Analysis generated seven themes relating to telehealth use: 1) Acceptability as a form of consultation, 2) Impacts on healthcare provision, 3) Communication & relationships, 4) Efficient form of consultation, 5) Comfort of conducting telehealth in different environments, 6) Technological barriers and 7) Future preferences. Conclusions: The rapid uptake of telehealth during the pandemic has mostly been well-received, and telehealth can be appropriately used in oncology. Practice implications: Barriers including providing appropriate facilities, technology, and telehealth training; and selecting appropriate patients must be addressed to enable sustained telehealth use in future cancer care. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Pandemics | en |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | en |
dc.subject | Telemedicine | en |
dc.subject | Referral and Consultation | en |
dc.subject | Videoconferencing | en |
dc.subject | Neoplasms | en |
dc.title | Exploring cancer patients', caregivers', and clinicians' utilisation and experiences of telehealth services during COVID-19: A qualitative study | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthor | Kennett, William | - |
dc.description.pubmeduri | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35688719/ | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.pec.2022.06.001 | en |
Appears in Collections: | Oncology / Cancer |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.