Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/416
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShakespeare, T. P.-
dc.contributor.authorWilcox, S. W.-
dc.contributor.authorAherne, N. J.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T00:11:10Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-15T00:11:10Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-
dc.identifier.citationOncoTargets and Therapy. 2016 May 11:9:2819-24. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S105174.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/416-
dc.description.abstractAim: Both dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (DE-EBRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improve outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. However, there is little evidence specifically evaluating DE-EBRT for patients with high-risk prostate cancer receiving ADT, particularly for EBRT doses >74 Gy. We aimed to determine whether DE-EBRT >74 Gy improves outcomes for patients with high-risk prostate cancer receiving long-term ADT. Patients and methods: Patients with high-risk prostate cancer were treated on an institutional protocol prescribing 3-6 months neoadjuvant ADT and DE-EBRT, followed by 2 years of adjuvant ADT. Between 2006 and 2012, EBRT doses were escalated from 74 Gy to 76 Gy and then to 78 Gy. We interrogated our electronic medical record to identify these patients and analyzed our results by comparing dose levels. Results: In all, 479 patients were treated with a 68-month median follow-up. The 5-year biochemical disease-free survivals for the 74 Gy, 76 Gy, and 78 Gy groups were 87.8%, 86.9%, and 91.6%, respectively. The metastasis-free survivals were 95.5%, 94.5%, and 93.9%, respectively, and the prostate cancer-specific survivals were 100%, 94.4%, and 98.1%, respectively. Dose escalation had no impact on any outcome in either univariate or multivariate analysis. Conclusion: There was no benefit of DE-EBRT >74 Gy in our cohort of high-risk prostate patients treated with long-term ADT. As dose escalation has higher risks of radiotherapy-induced toxicity, it may be feasible to omit dose escalation beyond 74 Gy in this group of patients. Randomized studies evaluating dose escalation for high-risk patients receiving ADT should be considered.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasmsen
dc.subjectAndrogen Antagonistsen
dc.subjectRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulateden
dc.titleCan we avoid high levels of dose escalation for high-risk prostate cancer in the setting of androgen deprivation?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorShakespeare, Thomas P.-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorWilcox, Shea-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorAherne, Noel-
Appears in Collections:Oncology / Cancer

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat  
ott-9-2819.pdf419.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing