Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/112
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTe Velde, B. L.-
dc.contributor.authorWesthuyzen, J.-
dc.contributor.authorAwad, N.-
dc.contributor.authorWood, M.-
dc.contributor.authorShakespeare, T. P.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-26T23:48:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-26T23:48:29Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology . 2017 Aug;61(4):528-533. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12580.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/112-
dc.description.abstractNTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the implementation of a hydrogel spacer (SpaceOAR) programme for patients treated with 81 Gy prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in a regional setting can reduce rectal doses and toxicity. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 125 patients with localised prostate cancer treated between April 2014 (programme commencement) and June 2015 were compared: 65 with SpaceOAR (inserted by five different urologists) and 60 patients treated over the same time period without SpaceOAR. Patients were treated with 81 Gy in 45Fx of IMRT over 9 weeks. Planning aims included restricting rectal doses to V40 Gy < 35%, V65 Gy < 17%, V75 Gy < 10%. Acute toxicity was assessed weekly during radiotherapy and at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Rectal volume parameters were all significantly lower in the SpaceOAR group, with an associated reduction in acute diarrhoea (13.8% vs 31.7%). There were no significant differences in the very low rates of acute and late faecal incontinence or proctitis, however, there was a trend towards increased haemorrhoid rate in the SpaceOAR group (11.7% vs 3.1%, P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: A SpaceOAR programme in a regional setting with urologists performing low volumes of insertions (<1 per month on average) is of clinical benefit, and was associated with significantly lower radiation doses to the rectum and lower rates of acute diarrhoea.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylateen
dc.subjectNeoplasm Stagingen
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasmsen
dc.subjectRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulateden
dc.titleCan a peri-rectal hydrogel spaceOAR programme for prostate cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy be successfully implemented in a regional setting?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorTe Velde, Bridget L.-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorWesthuyzen, Justin-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorAwad, Nader-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorWood, Maree-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorShakespeare, Thomas P.-
Appears in Collections:Oncology / Cancer
Urology

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing