Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/726
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavis, G.-
dc.contributor.authorSmyth, B.-
dc.contributor.authorKinchington, M.-
dc.contributor.authorBrown, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-22T05:20:25Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-22T05:20:25Z-
dc.date.issued2026-01-
dc.identifier.citationInternal Medicine Journal. 2026. 56(1):130-107.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/726-
dc.description.abstractHistorically, Cockcroft-Gault (CG) estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl) was recommended for drug dosing in the presence of kidney disease, but standard pathology reports only include estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). This single-centre retrospective cohort study of 162 patients ≥65 years old examined whether drug dosing errors occurred more commonly when using eGFR versus eCrCl. Of just over 200 medications requiring dose adjustment for GFR, one in eight had a potential prescribing error regardless of the method of estimating GFR. Use of CKD-EPI eGFR rather than CG eCrCl explained only a minority of potential prescribing errors, with no observed clinical consequences.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectGlomerular Filtration Rateen
dc.subjectRenal Insufficiency, Chronicen
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.titleDoes routine estimated glomerular filtration rate reporting adversely affect medication dosing in an older population?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorKinchington, Matthew-
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41171210/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/imj.70229en
Appears in Collections:Geriatrics

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing