Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/641
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZacher, R-
dc.contributor.authorCooper, I. L-
dc.contributor.authorPietzsch, A. F-
dc.contributor.authorWebb, L-
dc.contributor.authorPelecanos, A. M-
dc.contributor.authorEley, V. A-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-10T06:13:18Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-10T06:13:18Z-
dc.date.issued2025-03-
dc.identifier.citationAnaesthsia and Intensive Care . 2025 Mar;53(2):103-115.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/641-
dc.description.abstractChanging medical workforce demographics emphasise the need to understand and effectively manage pregnancy in the workplace. An Australian survey exploring pregnancy experiences of specialists and trainees working in anaesthesia received 242 responses describing 549 pregnancies. One hundred and sixty-two (67%) of these respondents were aged 31-40 years, 185 (76%) were specialists and 159 (66%) reported one or two pregnancies. Reported pregnancy complication rates were similar to national averages. Potentially harmful exposures included working >40 h per week (n = 298, 55%), ionising radiation and unscavenged gases. Other than ergonomic hazards and stress, exposures were not associated with an increase in self-reported complications. Moving heavy patients on a daily to weekly basis (n = 278, 53%) was associated with an increased risk for any maternal complication; odds ratio (OR) 2.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37 to 3.33, P < 0.001. High or debilitating stress levels were associated with any maternal complication, OR 2.93, 95% CI 2.06 to 4.17, P < 0.001, and any adverse neonatal/fetal outcome, OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.69, P = 0.018. The most common stress contributors were 'work-related', 'exams' and 'pregnancy anxiety'. Ninety-one (38%) respondents reported experiencing stigma or negative attitudes toward their pregnancy from anaesthetic colleagues. Overall, 171 (71%) of respondents were satisfied with their experience of working in anaesthesia whilst pregnant. Thematic analysis of free text comments identified three major themes: workplace culture, maternal and fetal wellbeing, and career impacts on both pregnancy and family planning. Development of multilevel mechanisms to guide and support pregnant trainees and specialists in anaesthesia is recommended to address these findings. Keywords: Anaesthesia—doctors’ health; anaesthesia—gender issues; anxiety; career mobility; infant; newborn; occupational exposure; occupational health; pregnancy; psychological; reproductive health; social; stigma; stress; trainee; training support; working conditions; workplace.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectPregnancyen
dc.subjectInfant, Newbornen
dc.subjectCareer Mobilityen
dc.subjectOccupational Healthen
dc.subjectReproductive Healthen
dc.subjectSexismen
dc.subjectSocial Stigmaen
dc.subjectAustraliaen
dc.subjectWorkplaceen
dc.subjectAnesthesiaen
dc.subjectAnestheticsen
dc.subjectWorking Conditionsen
dc.subjectAnxietyen
dc.subjectOccupational Exposureen
dc.subjectErgonomicsen
dc.subjectWorkforceen
dc.subjectPregnancy Complicationsen
dc.subjectTraining Supporten
dc.titleExperiences of Australian anaesthetists and anaesthetic trainees of working whilst pregnant: Results of a national surveyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorZacher, Rosmarin-
dc.description.pubmeduri39904573en
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0310057X241263116en
Appears in Collections:Surgery

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing