Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/639
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, S. L.-
dc.contributor.authorCasinader, S. J.-
dc.contributor.authorFernandez, R. S.-
dc.contributor.authorEasey, K. M.-
dc.contributor.authorChuah, E.-
dc.contributor.authorPerkovic, A. R.-
dc.contributor.authorHariharan, S.-
dc.contributor.authorScott, D.-
dc.contributor.authorMikhail, P.-
dc.contributor.authorSaid, C.-
dc.contributor.authorSpina, R.-
dc.contributor.authorMay, A. N.-
dc.contributor.authorBoyle, A.-
dc.contributor.authorFord, T. J.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-10T05:39:45Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-10T05:39:45Z-
dc.date.issued2025-03-
dc.identifier.citationAsiaIntervention . 2025 Mar 20;11(1):35-43. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00036.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/639-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Distal transradial artery (dTRA) access offers benefits to patients and operators. Aims: We sought to determine the feasibility and safety of the dTRA as a first-line vascular access site and to evaluate predictors of dTRA approach success. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analysed consecutive patients from three Australian centres who underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the dTRA (from November 2019 to December 2023). The primary outcome was procedural success (completion of a case using the dTRA puncture site). Secondary outcomes were access site crossover, procedural safety, arterial patency at follow-up, and predictors of procedural success. Results: A total of 1,692 patients were included (mean age 70.6±10.5 years, 59% male [n=993], mean body mass index [BMI] 31.0±7.0 kg/m2, right dTRA 85%, ultrasound guidance 99%). First pass success was achieved in 92.2% (n=1,560) of patients, and 1.5% had success on the second puncture of the ipsilateral dTRA. Crossover was required in 6.3% (n=107; proximal transradial [n=78; 4.6%], contralateral dTRA [n=22; 1.3%], femoral [n=6; 0.4%], ulnar [n=1; 0.1%]). There were no major vascular complications. Access site bleeding requiring treatment occurred in 0.3% (n=5) of cases. Proximal and distal radial occlusion occurred in 0.1% and 0.4%, respectively. Thirty-day major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 1.4% (n=24). Radial artery patency was 98% (630/641) at follow-up. Hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 1.73; p=0.029), an experienced operator (attending/consultant and ≥4 years' experience with dTRA; OR 2.80; p<0.001), and a low BMI (OR 1.48 per 10 unit decrease in BMI; p=0.012) were predictors of technical success. Conclusions: The "distal radial first" approach is feasible and safe for coronary procedures. Factors associated with procedural success include increased operator experience, a low BMI, and hypertension.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectCoronary Angiographyen
dc.subjectRadial Arteryen
dc.subjectBody Mass Indexen
dc.subjectConsultantsen
dc.subjectAustraliaen
dc.subjectPercutaneous Coronary Interventionen
dc.subjectHemorrhageen
dc.subjectHypertensionen
dc.subjectPuncturesen
dc.title"Distal radial first": feasibility and safety for coronary angiography and PCI in Australiaen
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorMay, Austin N.-
dc.description.pubmeduri40114735en
dc.identifier.doi10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00036en
Appears in Collections:Cardiology

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat  
AIJ-D-24-00036_Saunders.pdf603.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing