Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/634
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDaguman, E. I.-
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, A.-
dc.contributor.authorFlowers, M.-
dc.contributor.authorLakeman, R.-
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-10T04:50:43Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-10T04:50:43Z-
dc.date.issued2025-03-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Nursing . 2025 Mar 14. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17727.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/634-
dc.description.abstractAim: An analysis of mental health nursing de-escalation logs for 249 days from a regional adult inpatient unit in New South Wales, Australia, was completed to identify groups of cooccurring nursing therapeutic responses to aggression and examine their associations with reductions in restrictive practices and situational aggression. Design: A single-centre retrospective study was undertaken. Method: Hierarchical clustering of nursing interventions established groups of cooccurring nursing responses. Poisson mixed-effect models were then used to determine the associations of the intervention clusters with restrictive practices. Results: Two intervention clusters emerged: Cluster 1 involved verbal de-escalation with active listening and rapport building, whereas Cluster 2 included additional limit setting and problem-solving, distraction, sensory modulation, environmental change and individual staff time. Cluster 1 was linked with a reduction in seclusion use by 83% [IRR = 0.17, 95% CI (0.07, 0.41), p < 0.001], physical restraint by 79% [IRR = 0.21, 95% CI (0.11, 0.40), p < 0.001] and average judged situational aggression by 1.56 [95% CI (0.86, 2.25), p < 0.001]. Cluster 2 was related to statistically insignificant increases in the three studied outcomes. Conclusions: The intervention clusters prove the value of supplementary tools in surfacing nurses' therapeutic potential. The differences in restrictive practice use between intervention clusters signal the structure and progression of forming therapeutic relationships in aid of de-escalation and the possibility of assessing de-escalation components robustly. Relevance to clinical practice: Acknowledging and supporting nurses' therapeutic work support the development of recovery-oriented care and a positive professional identity for nurses. Reporting method: This study followed the applicable STROBE guidelines. Patient or public involvement: Due to the study's retrospective nature, there was no service user or public involvement.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectRestraint, Physcialen
dc.subjectInpatientsen
dc.subjectAggressionen
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen
dc.subjectNew South Walesen
dc.subjectCrisis Interventionen
dc.subjectPsychiatric Nursingen
dc.subjectAustraliaen
dc.subjectCluster Analysisen
dc.subjectMental Health Servicesen
dc.titleDifferentiating Therapeutic Responses That Reduce Restrictive Practice Use and Situational Aggression in an Acute Mental Health Uniten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorTaylor, Alison-
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorFlowers, Matthew-
dc.description.pubmeduri40084814en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocn.17727en
Appears in Collections:Mental Health

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing