Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/629
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHoward-Wilsher, S.-
dc.contributor.authorIrvine, L.-
dc.contributor.authorFan, H.-
dc.contributor.authorShakespeare, T.-
dc.contributor.authorSuhrcke, M.-
dc.contributor.authorHorton, S.-
dc.contributor.authorPoland, F.-
dc.contributor.authorHooper, L.-
dc.contributor.authorSong, F.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-10T01:21:25Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-10T01:21:25Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-
dc.identifier.citationDisability and health journal. 2016 Jan;9(1):11-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.08.009en
dc.identifier.issn1936-6574-
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/629-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Health related rehabilitation is instrumental in improving functioning and promoting participation by people with disabilities. To make clinical and policy decisions about health-related rehabilitation, resource allocation and cost issues need to be considered. OBJECTIVES To provide an overview of systematic reviews (SRs) on economic evaluations of health-related rehabilitation. METHODS We searched multiple databases to identify relevant SRs of economic evaluations of health-related rehabilitation. Review quality was assessed by AMSTAR checklist. RESULTS We included 64 SRs, most of which included economic evaluations alongside randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The review quality was low to moderate (AMSTAR score 5-8) in 35, and high (score 9-11) in 29 of the included SRs. The included SRs addressed various health conditions, including spinal or other pain conditions (n = 14), age-related problems (11), stroke (7), musculoskeletal disorders (6), heart diseases (4), pulmonary (3), mental health problems (3), and injury (3). Physiotherapy was the most commonly evaluated rehabilitation intervention in the included SRs (n = 24). Other commonly evaluated interventions included multidisciplinary programmes (14); behavioral, educational or psychological interventions (11); home-based interventions (11); complementary therapy (6); self-management (6); and occupational therapy (4). CONCLUSIONS Although the available evidence is often described as limited, inconsistent or inconclusive, some rehabilitation interventions were cost-effective or showed cost-saving in a variety of disability conditions. Available evidence comes predominantly from high income countries, therefore economic evaluations of health-related rehabilitation are urgently required in less resourced settings.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectCost Benefit Analysisen
dc.subjectDisabled personsen
dc.subjectEconomicsen
dc.subjectOccupational Therapyen
dc.subjectSelf-Managementen
dc.subjectMental Healthen
dc.subjectPsychosocial Interventionen
dc.subjectPhysical Therapy Modalitiesen
dc.subjectComplementary Therapiesen
dc.subjectPainen
dc.titleSystematic overview of economic evaluations of health-related rehabilitation.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorShakespeare, Thomas P.-
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26440556en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.08.009en
Appears in Collections:Occupational Therapy

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing