Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/616Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Fraser, S. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wong, P. K. K. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-01T00:47:09Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-04-01T00:47:09Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-02 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Australian Journal of Rural Health . 2017 Feb;25(1):28-33. | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/616 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: To report the initial two and a half years' experience of one of the first Fracture Liaison Services in regional Australia. Design: Case study. Setting: Hospital Clinic, mid-north coast NSW. Participants: Patients aged ≥50 years with a fragility fracture identified at Coffs Harbour Health Campus July 2012 to December 2014. Intervention: Patients were identified by a Fracture Liaison Coordinator (FLC) and seen in Fracture Prevention Clinic (FPC) by a rheumatologist. Patients discharged from FPC were contacted via telephone on one occasion 12 months later. Main outcome measures: Number/characteristics of patients seen in or declining an appointment in FPC, type of bone protective therapy commenced and patient adherence with this. Results: An appointment in FPC was offered to 222 patients but declined by 56 patients. One hundred and sixty-six patients were seen in FPC, of whom 40% (n = 66/166) had a prevalent fragility fracture but only 12% (n = 8/66) were on bone protective therapy. Eighty-two percent (n = 136/166) commenced bone protective therapy. Of the 55 patients discharged from FPC with long enough follow-up to allow contact at 12 months, 60% (n = 33/55) required bone health advice during the follow-up telephone call at 12 months. Of the 31 patients who commenced bone protective therapy, 65% (n = 20/31) said they were adherent with medication. Conclusions: A FLC, committed clinician and supportive hospital environment were all that was required for an effective Fracture Liaison Service in a regional hospital. The number of patients who declined an appointment suggested the implications of a fragility fracture were often not appreciated. Keywords: fracture coordinator; fracture liaison; fracture prevention; osteoporosis; regional. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.subject | Osteoporosis | en |
| dc.subject | Osteoporitic Fractures | en |
| dc.subject | Health Services Research | en |
| dc.subject | Delivery of Health Care, Integrated | en |
| dc.subject | Fractures, Bone | en |
| dc.subject | Preventive Medicine | en |
| dc.subject | Accident Prevention | en |
| dc.subject | Secondary Prevention | en |
| dc.subject | Preventive Health Services | en |
| dc.title | Secondary fracture prevention needs to happen in the country too: The first two and a half years of the Coffs Fracture Prevention Clinic | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.contributor.mnclhdauthor | Fraser, Sandy | - |
| dc.contributor.mnclhdauthor | Wong, Peter K. | - |
| dc.description.pubmeduri | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27087403/ | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ajr.12291 | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Allied Health | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
