Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/217
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWiebe, J.-
dc.contributor.authorLipman, J.-
dc.contributor.authorReade, M. C.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-03T05:22:06Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-03T05:22:06Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care and Resuscitation. 2023 Oct 19;24(2):183-187. doi: 10.51893/2022.2.OA8.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://mnclhd.intersearch.com.au/mnclhdjspui/handle/123456789/217-
dc.description.abstractMedications prescribed for indications or at doses, frequencies or durations not approved by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration are considered "off- label". Critical illness makes seeking consent for off-label medication use impractical. We aimed to characterise the extent of off-label medication use in a tertiary medical- surgical intensive care unit (ICU) by auditing the electronic health records of all patients admitted over a one-month period. We found 25.4% of 2292 prescriptions made for 142 patients were off-label. Eighty-one (37.2%) of the total of 218 different prescribed medications were used at least once for an off-label indication. Medications commonly prescribed off-label included antacids (pantoprazole, esomeprazole), analgesics (fentanyl, morphine, ketamine, pregabalin), anticonvulsants (levetiracetam), antibiotics (cefazolin, erythromycin), antipsychotics (quetiapine, haloperidol), and cardiovascular agents (metoprolol, clonidine). Nearly all patients (88.0%) received at least one off-label medication during their ICU stay. Most off- label medications were used for conventional (albeit not licensed) reasons, but nine out of 81 (11.1%) were not; for example, acetazolamide for hypertension, aminophylline for oliguria, and dexmedetomidine for seizures. Recognising the challenges of formally registering an indication with the Therapeutic Goods Administration, but also the value of reducing the incidence of medications used for potentially incorrect purposes, we suggest guideline endorsement of what constitutes standard critical care practice as an alternative to regulatory control.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectOff-Label Useen
dc.subjectAnticonvulsantsen
dc.subjectAntipsychotic Agentsen
dc.subjectCardiovascular Agentsen
dc.subjectAntacidsen
dc.subjectAnti-Bacterial Agentsen
dc.subjectCritical Illnessen
dc.subjectAnalgesicsen
dc.subjectIntensive Care Unitsen
dc.subjectCritical Careen
dc.subjectPrescriptionsen
dc.titleA point-prevalence study of off-label medication use in an Australian adult tertiary intensive care uniten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.mnclhdauthorWiebe, Jordan-
Appears in Collections:Critical Care
Medicine

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat  
main.pdf469.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing